Developing the Developer

Vietnam Edition

Project Evaluation: Cost and Effectiveness, Trying to Find the Balance


Since my arrival to Vietnam, my work has focused on assessing the impacts and effectiveness of microfinance and client satisfaction.  This has led me to reading a multitude of articles and commentaries on monitoring and evaluation (M&E) tools in development.  No matter the project, the NGO, or the size of the budget, the big dilemma or question to be answered is how in-depth should an evaluation go, how much money and time should be spent, and what are we really exploring?  While the monitoring and evaluation of development projects are crucial to the growth, success, and sustainability of a project, it is often hard to justify spending large sums of money on evaluation when money could be better applied or is needed elsewhere in development programming.  The key is balance.

My struggles here first began when I was researching effective ways to evaluate the impact of microfinance on the surrounding community.  In my research I have come across many articles tearing down the research of others, claiming it was not explicit enough to draw the conclusions that had been made.  I do not want to make this mistake.  Then I found RCT, randomized control trials.  Many articles praised this as the Holy Grail for measuring the impact of microfinance.  This is the answer I thought.  Little did I know how improbable this type of trial is for an organization with a small budget and an approaching deadline.  The dilemma: solid research and evidence or just enough to expose areas needing improvements?

Then I stumbled upon an OXFAM blog post on the matter. This post recognizes the need to demonstrate the impact of programming without going bankrupt or becoming what the author calls a ‘development lab’.  He says what Oxfam is attempting to do is to “mimic what RCTs do by statistically controlling for measured differences between intervention and comparison populations”.  This is reassuring, as our current plan of attack is to survey two communities, one where TDF’s programming is present and the control community where no microfinance opportunities are present. We are also hoping to mimic RCTs on a smaller scale; however, with financial restrictions we are still out to lunch on the final decision of implementation and size of sample populations.

There is a multitude of M&E tools, each with their own benefits, but in a time where organizations are strapped for both time and money with a growing demand to report, it is important to find the most efficient and effective way of project evaluation.  However, as a student I am conscious of collecting accurate data.  I am consistently at odds with what is academically preferred and what is best for the organization, or more important, the client.  Ultimately monitoring and evaluation is intended to improve programming, get better results, and further help the vulnerable people for whom the project was designed.  We should keep this in mind.

If you have any ideas or comments on M&E tools in development or suggestions for my dilemma, I would love to hear them.

About these ads

One comment on “Project Evaluation: Cost and Effectiveness, Trying to Find the Balance

  1. sarah
    October 25, 2011

    Amazing post! Useful for all interested in project effectiveness, no matter the category or business.

    I’ve attended one conference since working with WARECOD. On the final day, there was a group discussion about community events to drive the point (sustainable fishing methods, to improve the state of local aquatic resources and community health) home. I thought, how are they going to assess the impact that this conferences has really made. The majority of the donor money went toward financing the conference and these proposed community events (to occur at a later date). What was left for evaluation? Had the evaluated something similar before? If you haven’t, what would the donor think?

    I agree with you that there must be balance. But, especially when the project idea is newly implemented, you must deeply assess it’s successes/failures. I understand the hindering ability of the lack of finance, but isn’t it worth it for the long-term reapplication of these ideas? I believe that balance is achieved somewhat subconsciously- you know when you’ve gathered the necessities, but making a budget for this sort of go-with-the-flow process can be difficult for a tiny NGO.

    Research your little heart out. I know you’ll find the proper method.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on October 25, 2011 by in The 'd' word, The Commentator and tagged , , , .
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: